Join Team McDougle

Keep up to date with news from the McDougle campaign as well as opportunities to help the campaign

Loading...Loading...
Ryan McDougle

April 22, 2009

McDougle DNA Law Reaches Milestone

Filed under: general blog — Weathers Corp. @ 4:04 pm

DNA Law Sponsored by Senator McDougle Reaches Milestone

Richmond — As a result of legislation sponsored by Senator Ryan T. McDougle (R-Hanover), crimes continue to be solved successfully through the collection of DNA samples from individuals arrested for violent felonies. The Richmond Times-Dispatch published an article yesterday which references the legislation Senator McDougle sponsored in the 2002 General Assembly session. With the passage of Senator McDougle’s first of its kind in the nation legislation, Virginia law enforcement today are able to search for possible matches in the DNA unsolved crimes database. When a DNA sample is taken from an accused defendant and matched with evidence from another crime within the databank, law enforcement are given the tools needed to finalize and resolve unsolved crimes.

Recently, the 500th “hit” was made in the DNA database and Senator McDougle made the following comments.

“The Department of Forensic Science and law enforcement have successfully used the violent felony DNA data to make Virginians safer. Hitting this milestone is truly a victory in the fight against crime and will continue to prevent further crimes in Virginia.”

Below is the published article from the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

500th DNA violent-crime hit recorded

By Frank Green

Published: April 21, 2009

Enforcement of a Virginia law requiring DNA samples from people arrested for violent crimes reached a milestone earlier this year with its 500th “hit.”

A hit occurs when a DNA profile taken from a crime scene matches a profile of a known or unknown person in the Virginia Department of Forensic Science’s DNA databank, one of the oldest in the country.

Virginia has been collecting DNA from felons since the early 1990s, and in 2003, it became the second state to require DNA samples from arrestees, thus far collecting more than 40,500.

“There is little doubt that this statute has improved the commonwealth’s ability not only to identify suspects and prosecute crimes but also to prevent certain individuals from committing new crimes,” said Peter Marone, the department director.

Marone said, “When this law was passed, the legislature and the governor expected it to be valuable and effective as a tool to solve and even prevent crimes, and they were right.” More than a dozen states now have similar laws.

Department spokesman Tom Gasparoli said that in Virginia if an arrestee is not convicted, the DNA profile is removed from the databank. If convicted, the DNA profile becomes part of the databank’s convicted felon index.

According to the department’s Web site, as of Jan. 31, there were almost 300,000 profiles in the databank and there had been more than 5,400 hits.

The department does not keep track of how many cold hits lead to convictions but said it is known that Virginia had the first interstate hit of an arrestee’s profile.

A 2005 story in The New York Times about that case reported that a Long Island, N.Y., man, identified as Gregory Stovall, was charged in an unsolved 1997 rape of a Queens Village, N.Y., woman, based on a match between the his DNA and evidence from the crime scene.

The department said Stovall’s DNA was obtained when he was arrested for burglary in Portsmouth in June 2003.

In a Virginia case in March 2008, the DNA profile of a man arrested in 2007 in Manassas “hit” on a DNA profile in the state databank collected from the scene of a 2007 sexual assault in Prince William County.

In another Virginia case also in 2007, the DNA profile of a person arrested for robbery in Norfolk hit on DNA evidence from an unsolved 2005 Norfolk rape.

Contact Frank Green at (804) 649-6340 or fgreen@timesdispatch.com

April 20, 2009

2009 Survey Results

Filed under: general blog — Weathers Corp. @ 4:05 pm
Dear Neighbor,

I would like to thank you for taking part in my 2009 General Assembly Session Survey earlier this year in January.  Your feedback was extremely helpful and truly allows me to represent you better.

I thought you would like to see the results of the survey.  I sent the survey to constituents who have been contacting me since 2002 to share their views and insight.  Over 550 people participated!

Thank you again for sharing your views and please let me know if there is ever anything else I can do for you in the future.  You can reach me at senator@ryanmcdougle.com, 804-730-1026 or if you are on Facebook, please take a minute to visit my page.

With warm regards,

Ryan T. McDougle

2009 General Assembly Session Survey Results

Question 1

Virginia is currently facing a $3.5 billion budget shortfall in our two-year budget.  Please share with me how you believe we should deal with this shortfall.  Should the shortfall be made up entirely with spending reductions, or by increasing taxes and fees?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Spending reductions only

54.6%

Increasing taxes and fees

2.7%

Combination of reductions with increased taxes and fees

42.7%

Question 2

The single largest area of spending in the state budget is K-12 public education.  As we work to close the shortfall, how do you feel public education should be addressed?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

No K-12 education cuts, but make additional cuts to agencies and public safety

12.5%

Freeze teacher salaries

4.3%

Reduce administrative overhead

34.9%

Do not fund the Governor’s newly created Pre-Kindergarten program

48.3%

Question 3

During good economic times, Virginia has included in its budget one-time funding for non-state agencies such as cultural and non-profit organizations.  Some feel it is inappropriate for the state to provide grants to such agencies while others argue that it is important for the state to show its support for institutions that enhance the lives of Virginians, promote tourism, or provide services that are not available elsewhere.  Do you believe that Virginia should continue to provide funding for non-state agencies during good economic times?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Fund private organizations

34.3%

End funding of such organizations

65.7%

Question 4

Should there be a moratorium on starting any new government programs, no matter how worthy, until the economy recovers?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Yes

66.1%

No

33.9%

Question 5

In recent years, Virginia has had to extend its session with greater regularity in order to complete work on the budget.  Because more legislation is being introduced every year and session is not finishing on time, should Virginia extend the length of our current General Assembly session in order to prevent extended sessions in the future?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Yes

62.8%

No

37.2%

Question 6

Would you support or oppose placing tolls on roadways to fund additional road and highway construction?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Support

45.6%

Oppose

54.4%

Question 7

Thankfully gasoline prices are down now but they may increase again in the future.  Please share your thoughts about our energy situation.  If the federal government allows offshore drilling, they would have to enter into lease sale agreements with individual states to drill off their coast.  As part of these agreements, the states involved would receive significant royalties.  Should Virginia enter into a lease sale agreement with the federal government to permit drilling off of Virginia’s coast?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Support

80.4%

Oppose offshore drilling agreements

19.6%

Question 8

Would you support or oppose increasing the gasoline tax to pay for new roads?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Support

38.7%

Oppose

61.3%

Question 9

Do you support or oppose a longer mandatory waiting period before the purchase of a firearm or the issuance of a “conceal and carry” permit?
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Support

46.0%

Oppose

54.0%

Question 10

Should Virginia make it easier for unions to organize in our state by doing away with “right to work” laws which has made Virginia one of the best states in attracting new jobs?  This is the concept that an employee has the right to work without being forced to join a union.
Answer Options

Response Frequency

Easier for unions

11.3%

Stay as a business-friendly state

88.7%

April 3, 2009

RTD Exclusive-McDougle’s Comments on VDOT Bonuses

Filed under: general blog — Weathers Corp. @ 4:06 pm

Published in the Richmond Times-Dispatch

Senator McDougle Comments on VDOT Bonuses

By Jim Nolan

Published: April 3, 2009

The Virginia Department of Transportation last year paid more than $200,000 in one-time bonuses and more than $300,000 in salary increases to retain some of its top employees.

The 2008 payouts, disclosed in documents provided by VDOT at the request of the Senate Finance Committee, come amid ongoing plans in the agency to reduce overall staffing levels by 1,000 employees and to cut 450 hourly and temporary workers during the next 18 months.

Bonuses and retention payments are not unique to VDOT. For years they have played a role in how Virginia state government compensates its work force.

Last year, Virginia taxpayers funded $3.65 million for 7,458 one-time bonus payments to state employees, said Gordon Hickey, press secretary for Gov. Timothy M. Kaine. There were an additional 634 nonmonetary awards in gifts such as mugs, T-shirts, plaques and other items, valued at $28,729.

The payments ranged from modest cash rewards for employees taking on additional duties, to raises for workers acquiring additional job skills, to signing bonuses for new hires and retention bonuses to keep workers from leaving for better-paying jobs in the private sector.

“The commonwealth certainly recognizes the tough economic times we’re in and continues to tighten our belts just like citizens,” Hickey said. “There’s real value in offering skilled employees rewards and affirmation to retain them and to reward them for improving their skills.”

Critics say the decision to fork over extra cash is unwise given the agency’s aggressive downsizing and the need to curtail expenditures amid the recession.

“Certainly there are some very talented employees at VDOT and all state agencies,” said Sen. Ryan T. McDougle, R-Hanover. “But as a policy decision, it seems to me irresponsible to be paying out retention bonuses and out-of-cycle pay raises when we have seen a sustained climate of economic decline, and certainly unemployment levels in Virginia where they have not been in recent history.

“When we’re stopping core services and laying off employees and still paying out one-time salary increases,” McDougle continued, “then you have to really ask whether we are making good decisions with our resources.”

At VDOT, officials said the bonuses were a good investment that safeguards public safety on the state’s bridges and roads.

“I think it’s essential to attract and retain the right people to safely manage our highway system,” Virginia Secretary of Transportation Pierce R. Homer said. “And we delude ourselves if we think we can do this on the cheap.”

In addition to the bonuses, VDOT spent $306,432 in salary increases in 2008 to retain 74 employees, part of $2.37 million in “salary adjustments” made for 684 workers.

Homer said that with the exception of salary increases for worker retention, the additional money was taken up by required pay adjustments to workers who were promoted, reassigned, given expanded duties or transferred when VDOT shuttered 28 percent of its facilities across the state.

He also noted it would be “pennywise and pound foolish” not to increase pay of some specialized, in-demand employees. He said it costs less and is safer than losing experienced workers and training replacements.

“A structural bridge engineer, a traffic operations center — people’s lives depend on these things,” Homer said. “And if people want to make hay with that, they’re making hay with public safety.

“You can’t train somebody overnight for that. It costs thousands of dollars. We simply can’t afford to lose these highly qualified people.”

In recent years VDOT has been a target of conservative Republican lawmakers, who say the agency is lumbering and inefficient. One of the more vocal critics, Sen. Mark D. Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, recently launched a Web site called “Expose VDOT Waste.”

VDOT’s payroll this year is $651 million, up from $425 million in 2000. Officials said 70 percent of the difference is the result of approved increases in pay and benefits since 2000.

Reta Busher, the agency’s chief financial officer, said the department also has increased the number of positions it fills with professional engineers and licensed engineers. She said recruiting engineers has been a challenge.

But VDOT has not been immune to belt-tightening. As of March 1, VDOT had 8,300 employees; it will have an estimated 7,500 employees by July 2010.

Homer said the staff reductions are driven by the worsening economy and complicated by the fact that the legislature has been unable to agree on a statewide transportation package to fund maintenance and new construction projects.

As a result, the agency has been forced to cut its construction budget by about $3 billion, eliminating all urban and secondary road projects, Homer said. To accommodate reduced funding, VDOT is considering closing about half its highway rest areas and reducing ferry service by one-third.



Contact Jim Nolan at (804) 649-6061 or jnolan@timesdispatch.com .

VDOT bonuses

The $3.4 billion agency paid out $208,919 in one-time bonuses to 357 people in 2008.
The agency spent $62,000 on signing bonuses to hire 14 people.
The agency spent $69,173 to retain 12 workers.
Monetary recognition awards of $60,334, an average of $186, were split among 324 workers.
Seven people split $17,412 in bonuses for changing their duties or acquiring new training.